DFM ---ADX ---
6hControversial 2027 Philippine Budget Faces Backlash Over Social Service CutsWorld
6hReliance Addresses Satellite Market Competition Amid Starlink TensionsWorld
6hThe Controversy Surrounding Imran Khan’s Participation in Indian ProtestsWorld
6hDeadly Missile Strike Hits Presidential Palace in AdenWorld
6hEscalating Houthi Attacks on Saudi Infrastructure Result in CasualtiesWorld
6hUnderstanding the US 'Mother of All Bombs' and Its Potential Role in the Iran ConflictWorld
6hSaudi Arabia Remains Committed to 2027 Asian Cup Schedule Despite Regional TensionsWorld
6hConnaught Place under tight security as CJP flag rally sparks standoffWorld
14hPhilippine Peso Slumps to All-Time Low Against the DollarWorld
14hSaudi Arabia Executes Two Nationals Over Makkah Mosque IncidentWorld
1dIndonesia Wildfires Blanket Southeast Asia in Toxic SmokeWorld
1dTragic School Roof Collapse Claims Lives in PeshawarWorld
1dResilience Amidst Chaos: Saudi Athlete Survives Airport AttackWorld
1dConcerns Over Dropped Charges Against Philippine VP Sara DuterteWorld
1dThe Global Shift: Why US Missile Shortages are Changing Defense AlliancesWorld
1dStrengthening Gulf Security Through Unified Missile DefenceWorld
1dTragedy in Germany: Three Indian Students Lose Lives in FireWorld
1dActor Imran Khan Ordered to Leave India Following Mumbai Protest DetentionWorld
1dSaudi Arabia Postpones Six Kings Slam Amid Regional TensionsWorld
1dRising Poverty Risks: UNDP Chief Warns of Global Economic InstabilityWorld
1dAsia Must Remain Vigilant Against Future Financial InstabilityWorld
2dUS President Donald Trump to Attend ASEAN Summit in ManilaWorld
2dEmergency Landing at Jaipur Airport Amid Hijack AlertWorld
2dRwanda’s historic return of Formula One to AfricaWorld
2dSaudi Arabia Overturns Death Sentence for Sri Lankan NationalWorld

India Rejects International Tribunal Ruling on Indus Waters Treaty

Tue, Sep 1, 2026(45d ago)World

New Delhi has formally pushed back against a recent decision by the Permanent Court of Arbitration regarding the long-standing Indus Waters Treaty. The tribunal had issued a directive requiring India to adhere to its existing obligations concerning the sharing of river waters with Pakistan, specifically noting that India's efforts to suspend or alter the agreement lacked legal justification. In its ruling, the court emphasized that the 1960 treaty remains fully active and that India must ensure its ongoing hydroelectric projects in the Kashmir region align with the established design and operational standards.

In a sharp response, India’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs dismissed the verdict entirely, asserting that the court lacks the jurisdiction to interfere with the nation’s sovereign decisions. The Indian government has made it clear that the tribunal's pronouncements will have no bearing on its development projects, including those involving reservoir capacity at the Ratle Hydro-Electric Plant. While the court has mandated that a World Bank-appointed neutral expert review the technical compliance of these projects by 2027, India remains firm in its refusal to recognize the court's authority over the matter.

Comments0
No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts.