The Supreme Federal Court of the United Arab Emirates has recently upheld the original verdict in the “Justice and Dignity” case, rejecting the appeals submitted by the convicts. This decision comes after the Abu Dhabi Federal Court of Appeals, State Security Division, convicted 53 individuals and six companies associated with the Muslim Brotherhood, labeling them as part of the “Justice and Dignity Organisation.” The convictions were handed down on July 10, 2023, with penalties ranging from life imprisonment to substantial fines of up to Dh20 million.
The case has been marred by controversy, with human rights groups criticizing the trial for its lack of transparency and fairness. Many of the defendants had previously been convicted in 2013 for similar offenses, raising concerns about double jeopardy. The trial was characterized by restricted access to case materials, limited legal assistance, and allegations of abuse and ill-treatment. Despite these criticisms, the UAE authorities have maintained that the case was public and that the defendants were involved in establishing a clandestine terrorist organization.
The “Justice and Dignity” case highlights the ongoing tensions between the UAE government and human rights advocates. The UAE’s counterterrorism laws have been criticized for their broad scope, allowing for severe penalties, including life imprisonment or even death, for those accused of forming or managing terrorist organizations. The case also underscores the challenges faced by civil society in the UAE, where independent advocacy groups are often viewed with skepticism by the authorities.
The Supreme Federal Court’s decision to uphold the original verdict is seen as a significant development in the UAE’s legal landscape, particularly in how it handles cases involving national security and terrorism. The ruling is likely to have implications for future cases involving similar charges and will continue to be monitored by international human rights organizations.
The UAE’s legal system has faced scrutiny over its handling of mass trials and the application of counterterrorism laws. Critics argue that these laws are used to suppress dissent and limit freedom of expression. As the UAE continues to navigate its role in regional and global affairs, its approach to justice and human rights will remain under close observation.
